This entry is dedicated to José Antonio, who has written (you can read in comments to the entry of March 9) I am a demagogue.
The niceties that says (without providing either evidence or arguments) are:
1. According to my theory that all men should feel guilty and all women victims.
2. Women are responsible for their domestic situation, since they so choose freely.
3. In Western society the woman is not the case on an equal footing with men.
4. Women earn the same salary than men. Dear
José Antonio (or anonymous), I'll answer with evidence, but just in case I do not want to read my conclusion to issue from the beginning, you are ignorant and misogynist "?
The first trial value, affirm, is determined by the absence of reasoning, evidence, reasoning, etc. what you have written. The second, I ask you, you do not quite understand what comes to mind talking about what you do not know if it is not because you have something personal against women.
Ignorance is often a bad adviser and precipitation over the trial said the emotions of the reasons.
How much demagoguery? Western'm
and do not live with guilt. However, I recognize what makes the West in the rest of the world pharmaceutical industry (Novartis "?), Pollution (" Bhopal?), Financial system (Any other comments?) Arms industry, war "for justice or for oil , gas and diamonds? (Iraq, Afghanistan, Congo, etc.). Have you ever heard of this?
am white and do not live with guilt. But I must live in the world how people of other ethnic groups: immigrants in Spain, African Americans or Latinos in the U.S., Muslims in France, Hindus in Britain, Turks in Germany, etc.. Have you heard once all this?
official and I do not live with guilt. However, I recognize how other people work conditions, the majority who are not: graduates who do graduate work but with auxiliary contracts, endless working hours beyond the law, more than half the salary out of contract, unfair dismissal (especially if you get pregnant, etc.).
Have you ever heard of this? Or will you have the "mental rennet" to assert that there is no racism or poverty or the exploitation or pollution, and that the West has nothing to do?
Now we can use your theory: Does an immigrant is not free? He decided to immigrate. Can a worker is not free? If you work long hours is because he wants. Did the Congolese are not free? Not to sell their raw material to the "mafias" Western.
simplicity is a rational and emotional scaring, as aberrant and unfair.
I have no guilt but of accountability and justice You know what that is? And with my job I love and want to do something to improve the lives of others.
should consult the statistics and realize that there is a world beyond your door in all of these problems are real and have nothing to do with demagoguery.
Una vez situado en el contexto adecuado, vayamos con tu ligera ¿mezquindad (tercera acepción), estupidez (primera acepción)? Lo digo porque lo normal es manifestar supuestos o premisas (con datos objetivos y contrastados), para luego hacer derivar de ellas una conclusión necesaria que puede estar o no de acuerdo con lo que yo digo. Y finalmente, y si lo consideras necesario pues hacer un juicio de valor acerca de ¿mis propósitos? (Lo digo por lo de demagogo, aunque no tengo muy claro si sabes cuál es su significado: yo no soy orador, ni revolucionario, ni intento manipular a la plebe ni intento halagar a nadie, más bien al contrario). Y lo más gracioso de todo, aunque maldita la gracia que hace, is to follow your reasoning ... I do not because there is not, let's say your opinion of value, it is also demagogues: the General Council of the Judiciary, the Civil Guard, the Reina Sofía Institute for the Study of Violence, CIS, the English Society of Primary Care Physicians, the entrepreneurs of SMEs, the Institute of Women, UN, EU, etc.
much demagogy in the service of the female plebe!
But hey, let's continue.
I am a man and not live with guilt. However, I recognize that:
1. According to the Wage Structure Survey 2002, the latest published to date in the EU, the average wage gap in gross wages per hour is 20%, while wage discrimination itself would be 17%. That is, there would be a 3% would be determined by various personal characteristics, employment or business between the sexes. Do you understand? One must be very simple to not realize that all these studies do refer to the same job. Indeed, in 2008 the figures had not changed.
2. Suicide is the leading cause of death among women aged 30 to 34, an age that depressive disorders are accentuated due to the more demanding work and family who have themselves on men, and in which the "clock biological " Maternity refuses to wait any longer. This was stated today
Julio Zarco, president of the English Society of Primary Care Physicians.
3. Between 2005 and 2008 have been issued more than 25000 men for child abuse convictions in Spain. According to the Violence Observatory against Domestic and Gender Violence, the General Council of Judicial Power.
4. Spain Did you know that gender inequality has decreased compared to the activity and level of training of women, but there has been progress in working conditions and wages, employee benefits or reduction of discrimination? Therefore, the level of equality between women and men is the same in 2006 than in 1994.
5. About 12% of English women are abused (technical)
6. 39,931 women have been victims of abuse, harassment and sexual assault (details of complaints and only on the demarcation of the Guardia Civil), between 2002 and 2007.
7. Only 6.43% of women are present in the boards of large companies.
8. 72% of working women have part-time to devote to the care of children and elderly dependents.
9. The percentage of women who leave the labor market, citing family reasons by far exceeds that of men: over 95% for her, less than 5% them.
10. 22% of women entrepreneurs say their partner is the biggest drag on their work.
11. A total of 278 women were murdered by their partners or ex-partner from 2005 to 2008, increasing gradually each year: 62 killed in 2005, 70 in 2006, 72 in 2007 and 74 in 2008. The prevalence rate is, for all years (to be confirmed on the 2008) at around 4%. Ie die about four per million women are victims of domestic violence (60% and 70% are English).
I will not mention the hundreds of thousands of rapes that occur each year in the West, or prostitution gangs who enslave women in the West, or ...
And all this happens in the West: where do you get the stupid view that Western civilization is not subject and subordinate to the woman?
Luckily there are many people, institutions, laws, etc., Which are as demagogues like me. Do you know?: Law 1 / 2004 of 28 December Integral Protection Measures against Gender Violence and the report of the president of the Observatory Against Domestic Violence and Gender December 2008 (I think), the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo (1994), the Declaration on the Elimination Violence Against Women (1993), the Fourth World Conference on Women (1995), the CEDAW ratification of the European Union approved in the Beijing Conference (2005), the report of the Women's Institute Ministry of Gender "Women in figures: 1983-2008", etc., etc., etc.
I think you need to read a lot, think more and judge less.
Let us now with this superb second claim yours according to what the woman chooses to voluntarily and freely working double shifts, their domestic role and all that we charge on it.
Do you know something about values, how and what to learn and grasp? Do you know how culturally configured the way we feel and think about the world? Do you know what is the value system that makes you prejudice as prejudice and above, to believe (not know) you're right?
many years I've been doing research on how culturally configured human beings, in particular our ideas of family and relationships between women and men. I do know something (and I say in all modesty as possible because everything that I need to know), the end of the day took over 18 years doing research on these issues, you should read books, articles, lectures, courses , papers, projects, workshops, collaborations with institutions,
prizes ... According to your theory, the woman is the only responsible for their situation because they choose freely, according to you. But how far can you choose? Lee
before judging and you will realize that freedom of choice is more limited than it seems in some cases.
If a child, from birth, is rational and emotionally educated to use the veil, put an example, as part of their identity, as an adult can you say that freely choose the headscarf? Is an example because in the West this fight and we have carried out and the beat, for now.
What I maintain is that the models of family and couples in which educate us end up creating a context in which the woman is identified with the function of procreation, human term that applied to women's causes before person is seen as mother and wife (Check the statistics of the CIS, Scales of Opinion!) , which will not happen to men, and therefore the whole social system is aimed at building a reality in which she assumes that role.
- 70.3% (61% personally) believe that the role of the family has to do with the care and protection of elders and dependent children.
- 56.6% of female executives say that their partners put pressure to work fewer hours and spend more time with family.
- The 98.22% of part-time women say that they have to care for family.
- More than 80% of the English population believes that the proper role of women is "mothering."
- 50.8% of young men between 14 and 30 years and 47.9% of women believe that a mother's relationships with their children is less stable and affective if it is engaged in work outside the home. The father did not say anything.
This is not demagoguery, are data.
Is it really absolutely free when you choose? Are we trained for that decision is absolutely equal to men?
How many men, except for you, of course, think that arise when having a child will go to reduce working hours during the next 20 years, or give up your career? And when their parents become sick and need to care for them? The world is full of men who care for their children and more giving up your career!
Really, your ignorance gives grim.
However, you should recognize that women do not have many more alternatives, or does she or does anyone else and, of course, as the man leaves him free and he solves problems, as well as the State, because then ALAMP of beliefs stupid, ignorant, and leading questions, we generated a social system in which emotional women decreases and rationally to a social role (gender, they say whites) of mother, wife and caretaker of elderly and dependent children (This is nothing new. You can trace throughout the world and history from the origin clan societies to the current capitalist neoliberalism, through the Family Code after the Russian Revolution and the objectives and development of the Israeli Kibbutz).
You know what I'm talking about?
Typically if you have any questions ask and if you do not agree with some point of view, to rebut arguments and figures. Everything else says more about your misogyny that from my point of view.
Greetings.
The microsite also has the complete failure in losjuicios dictates that they followed the repressors Antonio Domingo Bussi, LucianoBenjamín Menendez, Cristino Nicolaides, Victor Enrique Rei and Christian Von Wernich, among others. 
Indeed, the laws relate to the administration, judges and legislators themselves to meet the requirements of this law, beyond the will of those in a historical moment occupy their respective offices. In this sense, the laws should be applicable to all branches of government (all entities and all levels) and the list of exceptions must meet the strict requirements of legality, legitimate aim and necessity that Article 13 establishes the Convention. It is also important to devote appropriate resources to enable the realization of the right to access independent and effective judicial control. 
