The establishment of Integrated Mass Transit-BRT-which in theory was carrying the conventional fleet owners of collective service being provided in the Metropolitan Area of \u200b\u200bBucaramanga-AMB-, in its operational structure deteriorates has serious shortcomings in the economic interests transporters local-understood as owners of minibuses, buses and minibuses-, once demobilized their vehicles are unable to continue operating conveyor inasmuch as the first installment of untying it reached the amount of 588 motor units took a clean sweep carrying capacity available nearby towns: Barrancabermeja, Socorro, San Gil, Cúcuta, etc. Even some ran with "lucky" and could move their vehicles to the coastal cities of Cartagena, Santa Marta and Barranquilla.
A significant number of unrelated vehicles in parking lots are unemployed in the provision of service due to court order are those with a single auto registration have court-ordered deposition derived from road traffic processes, with limitations on the property and these are not objects in the sale and transfer of the account to other parts of the nation.
On the other hand, there are vehicles whose age can not be transferred to the service of another mode of transport, especially service and also the transport companies that are available are not carrying capacity. The injury to the owner is twofold, firstly, out of your business in the AMB and the other, the vehicle that has life is worthless as an asset and unproductive, but causing permanent fixed costs, parking, toilet, tax, legal, etc. In conclusion, the BRT brought the absolute impoverishment of the small car owner.
To minimize the negative socioeconomic impact of the BRT in the conventional fleet owner, Mr. President Alvaro Uribe Velez in the National Development Plan, Act 819 of 2002, enshrined in Chapter III, Building Social Equity, giving impetus to micro, small and medium enterprises within the context of the democratization of property leading to target a Country of Owners, in the exercise of the National Development Plan and Mass Transit in Central State through the Minister of Transport was expressed on several occasions especially during the presentation made at the Congress of the Republic on March 29, 2004, one of the main aspects of the Policy Mass Transit was to encourage the strengthening and creation of Mass Transit Operators companies with high Democratic Participation in these societies, including the fleet owners.
TENDER FOR THE GRANTING OF OPERATION IN THE BMA Metrolínea BRT.
Metrolínea SA as the management body of the BRT. convened by public tender to interested companies for the operation of the BRT., a process known as M-LP-003-2007 came Metrocinco companies mobilized Plus SA and SA-register is valid in SA mobilized operator of eight (8 ) companies that are only there one in that vehicle owners are shareholders, are simply other members, and the bidding ended and was assigned 59% of the concession operation called the operator Metrocinco One Plus SA and the other bidder, mobilized SA, its proposal did not meet the minimum score for dealership, then was declared void which the Concession Two corresponds to 41% of the operation of the BRT.
is to record the terms of reference of the bidding process referred to, established in its terms of reference inter alia, the following:
Chapter 4 Conditions of Participation, Accreditation, Assessment and Evaluation sub paragraph 4.4. Experience of the proposer, which in turn is classified as business operational experience and expertise in transport operation, specified in the latter: Participation of Owners and composition of the proposer, to its credit rating assigned 60 points out of 100, as set in Figure 1.
Figure 1
From the above it follows that 60 points, representing 85.7% for the proposal is assign a concession is directly related to the owners of vehicles and motor units. The bottom line is essentially this, the real and effective participation of the owners of vehicles in both the social component in the stock in the operators, which involves business and operational experience as a tool validator is Resolution 2007 of AMB 261, which recognizes the collective inventory of conventional floats made by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Public.
Metrolínea SA invites public bidding M-LP-004-2007 for the granting of Operation Two. The terms of reference are the same as the previous tender and involved a single bidder, mobilized SA, as previously said seven (7) companies of the eight (8) that form are recruiters and to circumvent the terms of reference respect of the tendering companies formed new owners and transporters SPT latter link as shareholders in the offeror, the error arises when forming the SPT's, without real and effective participation of these and where each carrier auto shareholdings allocated between 52% and 97.6% of the shares, however to the shares they already own directly into the operator, ie transport companies in practice are at 75% equity component of the proponent company and the owners were assigned to 25% in contrast to the terms of reference ordered that the sum of the component stock of the owners of vehicles on the carrier, at least be 50%.
Since late 2007, the date of tender a hoy por hoy, la participación de los propietarios de vehículos tanto el componente social y accionario de la operadora Movilizamos S.A. no ha cambiado a favor del pequeño transportador, por el contrario los "dirigentes" del transporte han realizado maniobras tendientes a impedir que el propietario participe al interior de la empresa operadora, veamos:
1.- Oriental de Transportes S.A.: El señor LUIS HERNÁNDEZ a través de su hija -Gerente de la empresa- presiona a los propietarios de vehículos, impidiendo que estos presten el servicio, no dándoles despacho, valiéndose de artimañas los engaña amenazándoles con la desvinculación de su vehículo y el no reconocimiento Pay for it. Then buy the quota offered a paltry sum of money and thus the right to participate in the Operator not allowing it to make the social and equity in SA mobilized
2.Villa of San Carlos SA: In the same Mogollon Pablo Gómez sense through the deputy and low cunning, they buy the quota to the vehicle owner for paltry sum of money, into believing he is included in the operator as a shareholder, but they have not delivered MILLION PESOS MCTE. ($ 1,000,000.00) which is responsible for the next eighteen (18) months when they split with their vehicle (commitment of the Mobilized Operator SA, both in the bidding process and in the concession contract), since the owner by deception what he has done is to sell the quota to the Villa de San Carlos company and hence it is this that receives the mentioned figure .
Cootragas 3.-CTA: No vehicle owner is a shareholder in the Operator, within the cooperative most smallholders are not members of it, just members. The owners are pursued by the directors of the cooperative for not providing the service, so you have come to hold the card illegally Operation and monies produced by the long space of two months, causing obvious damage.
4 .- Lusitania SA: This company is the worst deeds, the STP is made in its shares with absolute majorities in the Lords desire and ALFONSO ALFONSO PINTO PINTO FRATALI ( father and son), the management company will work to program affiliated vehicles, in an irrational and inequitable, with the macabre subject that a good number of owners work an unproductive path and throw operational losses and be forced to sell the quota and the rights of shareholders of the operator to Mr. Pinto for ridiculous sum of money, also directly affects the drivers of the fleet and want the remuneration of these is assessed on a percentage rate occurred.
5.-Flotax San Juan SA and SA: These two companies belong to the same owner, the SPT's are made mostly by the owner and family, leaving the real owners out of the fleet operator. They are pushing for different ways to threaten the work of the vehicles for their owners to deliver the quota to the owner of the company for a paltry sum of money.
Under the same circumstances with previous company operates in the Metropolitan Services.
So, the postulate of the President of the Republic enshrined in the National Development Plan and Policy Mass Transit a Country of Owners and the democratization of ownership in the operators of the BRT's in the AMB not occur, unlike the managers of the seven (7) above mentioned companies have wanted to take possession of illegally for themselves and for others the new transport business in the region, if these "investors" were fleet owners to assist them just right, but are people who have always lived at the expense of the small landowner, and the implementation of the BRT want to continue with their illegal maneuvers today in the development of the BRT, by means of blackmail, criminal restraint, abuse of dominant power want to gain real experience of snatching the quota owner in return for insignificant sums of money.
Therefore, with this devious purpose seeking to take over most of conveyor capacity (quota), as it was previously said and reiterated, providing minimal amounts of money compared to what initially offered by the same operator, after receiving the monthly allowance trading advantage from the praenomen Company and thus achieved its purpose, can buy the operation of articulated buses and feeder patterns, delivering change the said quotas that have achieved sustained gouge the small business owners, for those whose only living for themselves and family is the bus that delivered in the form required to avoid being in total ruin.
