Why do not we decide? Too much ignorance not want to write about abortion, but about the empowerment of women and the record, I think it right that women of 16 (age is the most health) years have the ability to make decisions binding on their lives and their existence: if they are responsible for deciding whether a transplant make them or not, should also be to make the decision whether or not to abort. At the end of the day is in recognition of their autonomy, or whatever it is, the ability to give themselves rules for their action, which is what, precisely, characterizes a person, a human being ... But I do not want to get entangled in these issues. I will not say anything. Neither for nor against, because my opinion is irrelevant, because it is subjective and, therefore, only give if a friend asks me.
But that does not want to remain silent before such stupidity I hear these days because deep down, damn what the critics mind the situation of girls of 16 years in particular and women in general. Have lit the fire fueled by a statement, the less unfortunate of the prime minister, as they were any other pyre lit because ultimately what matters to them is, as always, the control of women, body, of his life, his destiny ...
Thousands of years later and still continue with the same.
They knew the Olympian gods, the god knew Hebrew, Islamic and Christian, knew the Jicarilla Apaches. Military strategists know, I know the priests, imams and monks. All knew, we all know: you have to turn off the power of women, precluding their autonomy, independence ballast through a home network. Thus, a woman or a mother or a girl, or is it wife or daughter, or a virgin or a prostitute, or is it soul or vase, or is subject or object ... There is no alternative, the disjunction is exclusive.
But this is not only divine wisdom, as the man in the street, stream-mill, so you know, or at least intuit, and hence the atavistic fear of the horns, Gatillazo, premature ejaculation, all those symptoms that show their submission to the true power of life: the woman's body, and its guiding principle: women's autonomy.
And so, instead of learning the true secret of nature, to reach climax in the arms of the goddess, to abandon the bittersweet pleasure of female orgasm, to submit to the inevitable dominance of embodiment, we rose up against it and violate, pulled his teeth, call your body is female because the man we reduce it to mere cleavage and lipstick, the heel raise on fine china, the hound, sobamos, overwhelmed, in the house in the street, at work, on TV, in magazines, on the wishes ... master your body, we deny their history, make their will, decided his fate: from dust to dust.
For us what is it? A pleasant briefly puts us ahead in the starting line for the next generation. What next? The world, life itself, the future, the profession, the public ... and for her ... a moment of pleasure? Nine months of pregnancy, childbirth, maternity leave ... What next? The care, the lives of others, the past, what could be and was not, motherhood, family ... or a combination
grueling two realities: working double shifts, reduced schedule to care for elderly and dependent children, less pay for equal work, fewer doctors, less presence in decision-making positions, ...
Did not deserve to decide what they want to with your life? Simply this: to decide for themselves.
But no, we still listen to the bishops and other salvapatrias, instead of dealing with their little affair, pedophilia, torture, sexual harassment, in seminaries and colleges, or major and minor corruptions of costumes (which cutrez) with microphone, The same applies to bribe a political position to spy on, or check out natural for developers, or who knows what other airlines meanness out there.
And what we say such ethical paradigms in the XXI century? That women should be monitored and guarded. And who are the custodians? Shameful denial of its very nature required submission to the voluptuous man, and fear before God, or what is the same: the usual, the man, the Church and God.
We still want to say, treating them as if they were minors, as if they knew not what they want to do with their lives ... To reiterate, we believe, pressure, harassment ... Why do not we calm at once?
is very simple: to decide for themselves them.
to them would be better, the world, too ... What about us? Quietly are more handsome.
Sembrando tu confianza 
The microsite also has the complete failure in losjuicios dictates that they followed the repressors Antonio Domingo Bussi, LucianoBenjamín Menendez, Cristino Nicolaides, Victor Enrique Rei and Christian Von Wernich, among others. 
Indeed, the laws relate to the administration, judges and legislators themselves to meet the requirements of this law, beyond the will of those in a historical moment occupy their respective offices. In this sense, the laws should be applicable to all branches of government (all entities and all levels) and the list of exceptions must meet the strict requirements of legality, legitimate aim and necessity that Article 13 establishes the Convention. It is also important to devote appropriate resources to enable the realization of the right to access independent and effective judicial control.